Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON APRIL 15, 1996 <br />(ii9 - i»2128 Orono Hockey Boosters - Continued) <br />Peterson asked about the walk-\^ay between the arena and school The path will be <br />setback from Old Cry stal Bay Road, 40* in length, and of bituminous materials The lease <br />calls for the path to be maintained by the school and replacement costs paid for by the <br />Boosters Karin 7eeh said the students will use the hill inside of the oath raking the <br />shortest route possible <br />The fencing placement and material, separating the arena from the residential area, will be <br />determined once the building is erected with direction provided from Gerry Timm as to <br />the type. <br />Jim Grabek, 3050 Jamestown Road, said the project has been underway for years, yet the <br />neighbors have only been involved since January. He said the setback was changed to <br />accommodate the project He feels the lot is inadequate for the number of parking spaces <br />and will create parking problems during major events Grabek said, with the shortcoming <br />of the school budget, he objects to spending $175,000 He said the building placement is <br />inconsistent with the comprehensive plan He noted the plan calls for the promotion of <br />development with ‘hat of a neighborhood and not in conflict with a neighborhood He <br />said he is not opposed to the arena but feels the site is not appropriate to the <br />neighborhood or for the City Giabek said the arena is inconsistent with the open space <br />plan. <br />Grabek review ed pictures taken of the site with the Commission in relation to CoRd 6. <br />He asked that the Commission consider moving the building to provide more protection <br />foi the neighbors Grabek said the soil borings are not conclusive that the building could <br />not be moved to the south <br />Engebretson said he had informed Grabek that if money was the issue, the Boosters would <br />move the arena to the south. He said they reviewed it from an aesthetic and functionality <br />standpoint. <br />Roseboom noted that the building has a corporate look, not that of a building with many <br />loading doors Roseboom said the preference is not to place parking lot in front of the <br />door. He noted the receipt of sunlight is the functional factor with a south facing building <br />being the best Grabek asked about an entrance to the erst or the southeast side <br />Roseboom said arenas w ork best with entrances on the ends of the building. Grabek <br />suggested entering across the wetland and asked for additional soil borings Engebretson <br />said there is no reason for additional soil borings as it is not an issue of soils or cost but <br />one of aesthet'cs and functionality. <br />15