My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-23-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
09-23-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 12:58:10 PM
Creation date
9/5/2023 12:54:49 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
390
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 9,1996 <br />(#6 - #2160 David Dotzenroth - Continued) <br />Kelley was concerned with what would occur if the garage was found needing total <br />rebuilding. Jabbour said if walls have to be removed, the application would have to come <br />back before the Council Gaffron said if the garage has to be rebuilt, the application <br />would come back before the Council Kelley said he wanted the applicants to understand <br />and the building inspector aware of possible problems Gaffron clarified that the garage <br />must be within the 1000 s.f size limitation, conditions #3 and 4 were eliminated. <br />Condition #5 requiring the completion of the house was to continue Also, Finding #6 <br />was added noting the difference of opinion betw een the Council and Planning <br />Commisrloa was due to the concern for the trees and need for additional concrete adding <br />to hardcover, and the similarity between garages in the neighborhood. Callahan <br />commented that the similarity issue would not be valid as impiovements have to begin <br />somewhere. Jabbour asked why the push to finish the house was requested when no <br />neighbors have complained Gaffron said the building permit allows for one year to finish <br />the exterior work on project. Goetten said the concern was beginning another project <br />when one was already begun. Dotzenroth noted a problem with a contractor setting the <br />remodeling back in time. <br />Vote: Aves 3, Navs 1, Callahan Motion carried. <br />(#7) #2161 JAMES AND MELISSA EASLEY, 4105 HIGimOOD ROAD <br />VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3759 <br />The applicants were present <br />Gaffron reported that the property consists of a 40' wide lot, 8500 s f in area, with an <br />existing house located mainly in the 0-75' setback with a detached garage located near the <br />street and side lot line in poor condition. The parking area is gravel. A sidewalk and <br />retaining wall also e.xisl on the property. <br />Gaffron informed the Council that it was the applicant's intention to tear down the garage <br />and build a new detached garage within 3' of the side lot line and 25-30 ’ from the street. <br />The doors would be located to the street side with parking in front. An enclosed <br />stairway is proposed for the 2-story garage with a basement resulting in three levels. A <br />future concept of the attachment of the garage to a new house located out of the 0-75' <br />setback was also noted. <br />•1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.