My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-23-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
09-23-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 12:58:10 PM
Creation date
9/5/2023 12:54:49 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
390
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINXFTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMI^n^sION <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 20, 1996 <br />The hardcover in the 0-75' setback exists at 1200 s.f. and 900 s f in the 75-250' zone. <br />The proposal would increase these calculations by 85 s f in the 0-75' and to 1785 s f in <br />the 75-250' zone The overall allowed hardcover of 25% is 2724 s f and is proposed at <br />306j s.f!, an increase ot appro.ximately 300 s.f. over the allowable. <br />Gaffron continued that this is also a bluff situation The addition to the bulk of the <br />stpjcture would have an impact. Grading would also be required within the bluff impact <br />zone for the driveway Gaffron said the bluff impact is minor, how ever, w hen compared <br />to other issues involved. <br />A main concern is with the septic system for the property. The current septic system is <br />non-conforming and requires replacement, for wliich a site exists Tliere is, however, no <br />available alternate site on the property for the proposed 3-bedroom house. The <br />neighborhood is proposed for sewering but thJs is an unresolved issue Gaffron <br />questioned whether the house should be expanded to 3 bedrooms without an alternate site <br />or Withhold final approval until the sewer issue is determined. <br />Applicant, Paul Hedlund, said the property was very unusual. It is their intent to keep the <br />home intact and build onto it as opposed to tearing it down and starting over with new <br />construction. <br />Peterson commented on the large number of variances fo. he application. He noted that, <br />although the property deser\-es to have a home on it, the applicant needs to w'ork with <br />Staff to make it a viable proposal. Hedlund said he sees the plan as the best for the <br />property and reiterated the purchase was contingent on City approval. <br />Stoddard acknowledged the good design and elevations, but asked the applicant if he <br />would consider moving the garage to the west. Sue Hedlund said the west side of the lot <br />w-as steep and questioned the encroachment of the bluff area Paul Hedlund also noted <br />that the well was located on the west side of the property. <br />During public comments, Charles Truman, who lives across the street from this property, <br />voiced bus approval of the proposal. He said it would cause no hardshup to the <br />neighborhood.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.