My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-23-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
09-23-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 12:58:10 PM
Creation date
9/5/2023 12:54:49 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
390
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Orono <br />2750 Kelly Parkway <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, Mn 55323 <br />SEP 6 r* " <br />i.e. Request for sewer connection to the North Brown Rd. sewer project for 2085 <br />county Rd. Six. <br />Dear City Officials. <br />Because of the location of a septic system designed by S&P Testing on my <br />property, I had a second opinion as to the suitability of the site that was tested and <br />approved by the city when this property was subdivided. Mike , Steve, Bob Koch <br />(Septic testing and Design), and myself walked the site and found some areas that met <br />the 12 inch standard and most that did not. I was told that This could definitely not be <br />used as a site because it did not meet the standard. I then requested that since we <br />were all here that we should retest the borings on the site that was supposed to meet <br />code. We found a few borings to be ok but 3/4 ’s of the site was below standard just as <br />the first site was. In addition, the soil is to be undisturbed and non compacted by <br />heavy equipment. The site S&P selected has 20 to 30 tree boring sites where trees <br />were spaded out by heavy trucks and a plug of soil plopped into the site. This soil <br />does not meet the criteria set by the state. Now, instead of saying that this site could <br />not be used as quickly as Steve dismissed the First site, 1 was told that we could get <br />special permission to build an experimental system but if it fails, nobody would be at <br />fault. I asked what would be done if it does fail because I have no place to build a <br />septic system. Steve told me that they would require me to build on the same site!! In <br />discussion with Bob Koch and Elmer J. Peterson co., They had never heard of such a <br />ridiculous idea. If it fails the first time with a special design, what makes anyone <br />believe that it will last when built the second time. Mike Gaffron was shaking his head <br />when we were investigating the borings on the "approved site". He could not believe <br />they designed it over all the tree borings and obviously heavy equipment had to have <br />driven over this area extensively. Bob Koch told me that there is no question that I <br />should get onto the city sewer system because to build on any site would require a <br />huge addition of sand and that would drive the cost of the system very high and no <br />guarantee that it could last. He would not trust it. Plus, to be on sewer would save all <br />the trees that would have to be destroyed for the experiment. <br />I am requesting that my property be included in the North Brown Rd. sewer <br />project and that an easement be allowed to cross 1090 N. Brown Rd. property. 1090 <br />North Brown Rd does have two to three viable sites for septic systems and does not <br />require the city sewer as my property does. If you have any questions my phone at <br />home is 475-3197 and work 475-0989. Thank you for your consideration of this <br />matter. <br />Sincerely, <br />Dr. John Maresh
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.