Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MEETING <br />SEP 2 3 1996 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />cmroFORONO <br />DATE; September 17, 1996 <br />ITEM NO.: <br />/, <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Michael P. Gaffron <br />Title assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: City Sewer Request, John Maresh, 2085 Sixth Avenue North <br />Attachments:A. <br />B. <br />C. <br />D. <br />Letter from Mr. Maresh Received September 6, 1996 <br />Air Photo of Site <br />Council Minutes 6/10/96 <br />Memo and Exhibits of June 5, 1996 <br />On June 10, Council directed staff to investigate the concerns presented by Mr. Maresh <br />regarding the inability to find suitable drainfield sites on his homestead property and his vacant <br />lot. Staff has met twice on the property with Mr. Maresh and his consultants. We have <br />reached the following conclusions: <br />1.Vacant lot abutting BrowTi Road (Created in 19871. <br />It appears there are at least two or three suitable undisturbed sites for a mound <br />system on this vacant two acre lot. This summer S-P Testing completed borings <br />confirming that these sites are available. Therefore, staff finds no reason for Mr. <br />Maresh to further pursue the provision of sewer service to the vacant lot. <br />2.Residence parcel. <br />The 2.5 acre residence parcel was originally tested for an alternate site in 1987 <br />by SMI Testing, who reported suitable slopes and percolation rates, and mottled <br />soil at a depth of 3* at a location directly south of the existing house. This was <br />accepted as a suitable alternate site that would require a mound system. <br />In 1996 S-P Testing found mottling at a depth shallower than 12" at the same <br />site tested in 1987, and concluded that the original site was not useable. S-P <br />Testing then identified a site slightly higher in the topography and to the <br />southwest of the house, which met the 12" minimum depth to mottling but <br />would require the removal of a large number of trees. The City accepted this <br />site based on the infomiation submitted by S-P Testing. <br />Not wanting to lose so man>' trees, Mr. Maresh hired another site evaluator. Bob <br />Koch, who pointed out that a portion of the S-P Testing site could be considered <br />as disturbed soils due to past use as a tree farm, noting the numerous <br />depressions where trees had been spaded out. Koch was able to find no suitable <br />sites on the property meeting the criteria for a standard mound system. <br />1