Laserfiche WebLink
Chuck Dovs-ney <br />August 22, 1996 <br />Page 2 <br />5.Martin then asked for the application to be tabled before it was reviewed by the <br />Planning Commission, because he decided to sell the house. He never re-opened the <br />application and the issues of the excess hardcover and gazebo setback were never <br />resolved. <br />At this point I suggest the following course of action: <br />a. Have the sur\'eyor (presumably Gronberg, who has all the basic work done in prior <br />surveys) do a hardcover worksheet for the site to confirm the level of hardcover in 1996. <br />b If 75-250' hardcover is over 7,890 s.f, your options are: <br />1. Remove the excess hardcover, QK <br />2. Apply for a hardcover variance, i.e. re-activate Martin's application. <br />c. If 75-250' hardcover is 7,890 s.f or less, then the only issue is whether the gazebo is at <br />least 10’ from the house. It would be appropriate for the Building Inspector to review <br />whethe- ’-e gazebo might be considered as part of the house structure, which would negate <br />this iss f, however, he considers it as a separate accesso*^' building, it must meet the 10’ <br />setback, fit doesn't, your options are: <br />1. Move it to a legal location that meets 10'. OR <br />2. Apply for a structure-to-structure setback variance <br />I'm enclosing the documentation on this issue, and will be pleased to answer any further questions <br />you may have. This issue must be resolved before we will issue any further building permits for the <br />property. <br />Sincerely, <br />Michael P. Gaffron <br />Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Enel. <br />cc: Lyle Oman, Building Official