My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-23-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
09-23-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 12:58:10 PM
Creation date
9/5/2023 12:54:49 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
390
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MeETlNQ <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Sfp 23 <br />DATBv 18, 1996 <br />ITEM NO.: / 0 <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Jeanne A. Mabusth <br />Title Building & Zoning Administrator <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #2172 Gerald and Nancy Bloms, 4195 Forest Lake Drive - Variance - <br />Resolution <br />Zoning District:LR-IB <br />Lot area = 15,832 s.f. <br />Additional Exhibits <br />J - Applicant's Letter of 9/5/96 <br />K - Adjacent Property Owners Acknowledgement Form <br />L - Applicant's Letter of 9/17/96 <br />Brief Review of Application <br />Applicant seeks approval of a structural coverage variance to permit construction of a main <br />level deck addition at 12' x 14.6' at the southwest comer of residence. The 168 s.f. of new <br />deck area results in an increase of 1.1% structural coverage. Structural coverage is at 15.7% <br />and is proposed at 16.8%. The structure v\ill meet all required setbacks of the LR-IB zoning <br />district. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the application as proposed <br />but conditioned approval on final resolution to be filed on the Chain of Title of the property <br />to include a disclaimer that states the property has been approved at 16.8% of structural <br />coverage and that the City will not approve any future request to increase structural coverage <br />on this property. <br />The applicant voiced major concern with such a disclaimer being added to the resolution, <br />noting that it would have a negative impact on the value of the property should the property <br />be offered for sale in the future. Mrs. Bloms asks for special consideration of the Council in <br />her letter of September 17th, Exhibit L, in which she notes that the majority of homes <br />surrounding her property are far more in excess of the allowed 15% structural coverage. She <br />notes her home was built in 1983 prior to the passage of the stmctural coverage ordinance and <br />that she nor her surrounding neighbors have any knowledge of the ordinance.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.