Laserfiche WebLink
MINIITES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY' COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 26, 1996 <br />(H6 - #2158 John O'SulHvan/Grace Baptist Church Property - Rezoning - Continued) <br />Gafllron informed the Council that the Planning Commission reviewed the rezoning and <br />recommended approval by a vote of 6/0. Noted in their conditions and reasoning was the <br />concern for the property in its present distressed condition and vacancy. The Planning <br />Commission recommended rezoning without performance of a comprehensive study of <br />the Navarre area because of the church condition and its location being surrounded by <br />commercial on two sides. They also thought the B-5 zoning matched the proposed uses <br />and noted the overwhelming support being given by the resideitts and businesses in the <br />surrounding area. The Commissioners saw this development as being a possible catalyst <br />for improving the Navarre area. <br />Gaffron noted that the Planning Commission also saw the need to change wording within <br />the B-S zoning list of allow ed uses They asked that the B*5 zoning be amended to <br />eliminate some of the uses they see as inappropriate to the times. <br />Gaflfron noted the petitions and letters of approval within the information packets. The <br />Council was asked to take formal action for either adoption, denial, or tabling, and to <br />direct Staff whether to proceed with amending the B-5 code <br />Callahan asked O'Sullivan for his comments. O'Sullivan reported that he was invdved in <br />the B>5 selection for the property He read the zoning codes and saw the B-5 as the best <br />fit for the property and neighborhood. Two public tent meetings were then held. People <br />living within 600' of the property as well as a 6 square block area were notified of the <br />meetings The meetings were attended by 80 people. O'Sullivan said there were no <br />objections voiced to the proposal O'Sullivan also noted that Planning Commission Chair <br />Peterson and two other Commissioners attended at least one meeting. Peterson was said <br />to have stated at the meeting that the Commission does not take rezoning lightly. <br />O'Sullivan noted that Peterson made the motion for approval at the Planning Commission <br />meeting commenting that the proposed use was the best fit for the site. <br />O'Sullivan also reported that he contacted 80% of the businesses in the community. All <br />of those contacted gav'e their support of the proposal and signed a petition. <br />O'Sullivan also said he has received support of the City Staff. He reported that in <br />meetings with Shawn Gustafson, City Engineer, and a County engineer, no red flags were <br />thrown regarding access e.xcept that they not be too close to the comer. O'Sullivan noted <br />a letter from Gustafson dated March 12 that states it appears the use is good and feasible <br />from an engineering standpoint. Gustafson confirmed stating this in the tetter. <br />O'Sullivan asked the Council to endorse the rezoning. He noted the number of fetters <br />received favoring the proposal and related some of the comments received. <br />Dan Clausen added that he would like to see the property sold noting that O'Sullivan has <br />been the first developer with both a good plan and finances to back it up.