My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
09-09-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 12:28:35 PM
Creation date
9/5/2023 12:25:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Request for Council Action continued <br />page 2 of 2 <br />May 8, 1996 <br />Dan Handlin Request to Acquire City Property to Resolve Non-Conforming Driveway Issue <br />open space; that are adjacent to private properties. Staff periodically receives inquiries regarding <br />whether the city would be inter;:sled in selling portions of these properties to adjacent property <br />owners for various reasons. <br />Staff regularly discourage these requests. Because the driveway is located on a portion of the <br />parcel that does not affect the wetland or sewer line, it would be possible to assist Mr. Handlin <br />without adversely affe-cling the various purposes for which the city acquired the parcel. <br />The third issue is whether the negative impact on the Handlin property caused by relocating the <br />driveway is substantial enough to merit the city assisting in resolving the driveway non <br />conformity. A feasible option available to Mr. Handlin is to move the driveway so that it is <br />totally on his property. <br />Prior to the driveway being located in its current location the driveway serving the garage <br />structures in the rear yard was located directly adjacent to the east side of the house. This area <br />is now part of the front lawn area. Relocating the driveway to this location is a feasible <br />alternative since this portion of the front yard area is relatively open. It would require the <br />relocation of one large pine tree. Mr. Handlin indicates in his letter that he has substantial <br />concern regarding the disruption this would cause to the natural character of the existing front <br />yard. <br />If the Council finds the negative impact of moving the driveway is of such an extent as to merit <br />the reconveyance of a portion of the city property to Mr. Handlin, staff would recommend four <br />conditions. <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />The portion of the parcel to be reconveyed be minimized <br />The width of the driveway, particularly at its two ends, be reduced as much as possible <br />Mr Handlin bear the cost of any survey and legal work required related to a division of <br />the city parcel and a lot line rearrangement. <br />4.Mr. Handlin follow through with a lot line rearrangement process to add the parcel to <br />his existing parcel. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Motion to approve/deny Mr. Handlin’s request to acquire a portion of the city parcel adjacent <br />to his property to bring his existing driveway into conformance.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.