Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cmr COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 26« 1996 <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />(•#3) REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 12,1996 <br />Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council <br />Meeting of August 12, 1996. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />The Park Commission was not represented. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />Planning Commission Chair Dale Lindquist had no comments. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />There were no public comments. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />(#4) «150 KENT AND SUSAN SWANSON, 3229B CASCO CIRCLE - <br />VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3753 <br />The applicants were present. <br />Mabusth reported that this property provides access to two adjoining properties The <br />proposal is for variances for hardcover in the 0-75' and 75-250' setback zones, lakeshore <br />setback, and average lakeshore setback for the construction of two small additions. One <br />addition is 27 s f to the lakeside consisting of a single-story bay addition located in the 0- <br />75' setback. The applicants propose the removal of a 3' wide deck at 103 s.f. This <br />improvement would result in 76 s f reduction of structural coverage. The other addition <br />is located outside of the 0-75' setback area. It is a single story addition to the kitchen to <br />expand the dining room area. There would be no reduction in hardcover as <br />improvements will be located over existing hardcover. The additions are located 30' and <br />40+’ in front of the average lakeshore setback. <br />Mabusth said the applicants are in the process of reviewing their financial ability to <br />complete the additions. Applicants may only proceed with one improvement. <br />Mabusth noted that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance <br />application. The only member voting against the proposal was Peterson, who historically <br />has voted on principle against proposals encroaching the average lakeshore setback. <br />Peterson did say that there was no visual impact for neighboring properties.i