My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
09-09-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 12:28:35 PM
Creation date
9/5/2023 12:25:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
minutes Or THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 19, 1996 <br />(#6 - #2161 James and Melissa Easley - Continued) <br />There were no put Tic comments. <br />Lindquist commented tha. there were . number of variances with the size of the lot but <br />agreed that the proposal was an improvement. <br />Gafiron noted the 3' side setback was an essential minimum with a 2' overhang and the <br />drip line f from the lot line He also noted the uniqueness of the propo^ due to <br />dr^nage Gafiron said a fire wall w ould be required, but there would be a 10-11 <br />separation from the neighbor ’s garage. <br />Stoddard moved, Hawn seconded, to recommend approval of “ <br />proposed Smith noted that the garage space for office, plumbing, and spa <br />L being considered in this proposal. Hawn asked if it would be <br />aoDlicants said the use of the office terminology was only due to a lack of knowing <br />to call the space Stoddard noted that the height variance could result in being more <br />intense. Vote; Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />Susanka informed the Planning Commission that she has worked with many different staff <br />gejjjge from other cities and has found Gaffron to be excellent to work with and very <br />(#8) #2163 LARRY AND SHARON GEHL, 1825 CONCORDIA STREET - <br />VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 9:05-9:13 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />The Applicants were present <br />Gaffron reported that an addition to the house has begun in the 75-250 ’ setback, but the <br />applicants propose a second story deck above the existing one story screen porch, which <br />encroaches the 0-75' by 12’ and would change the roof pitch of the porch to being flat but <br />with a deck and railing above it. This would add height past the average lakeshore <br />setback line and past the 75 ’ line. Gaffron also noted the existing grade level deck. The <br />average lakeshore setback line was said to be in line with the house and possibly behind <br />the setback with the survey line as shown. Gaffron said there are also *’ ubs with rock <br />and plastic which normally would be removed within the 0-75' setback. A sidewalk has <br />been taken out in the 0-75' area. <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.