Laserfiche WebLink
3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 15, 1996 and <br />August 19, 19% and recommended approval of the variances as amended based <br />upon the following findings and hardships: <br />A. Residence structures along this section of lakeshore are located 175+' <br />from shoreline restricting placement of structure on property. <br />The majority of residences are located to the east or street side of <br />property. <br />B. <br />C. The boathouse at 400 s.f. in area is in excellent condition and has been <br />maintained by owners. Both neighbors on adjacent properties have asked <br />that the structure remain because of its attractiveness. <br />D. The higher elevations at the residential construction line eliminates any <br />negative impact on lakeshore views by the single story boathouse at the <br />lakeside. <br />E. <br />4. <br />F. <br />G. <br />Placement in approximate footprint of existing residence will eliminate <br />need to remove trees and further excavation into the higher elevations to <br />the east. The majority of runoff from the developed site will drain <br />towards lakeshore over the extensive 180' of grassed yard. <br />The property is located on the point of the shoreline and as a result of <br />the angle of the shoreline, the structure is located further from the <br />shoreline than the neighboring houses. <br />The homeowners, receiving most impact from new construction, have <br />approved the redevelopment plan for the property. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />Page 2 of 5