Laserfiche WebLink
Request for Council Action continued <br />page 3 <br />August 30, 1996 <br />Zoning File #2151 John and Janice Hurd. 2795 Casco Point Road <br />G-1 <br />G-2 <br />H ■ <br />I . <br />J <br />K <br />L <br />M <br />N <br />O <br />P <br />Q <br />Erickson Letter-July 15th Meeting <br />Erickson Letter-August 19th Meeting <br />Theilmann Letter-7/8/96 <br />Topographic Map Locating Agreed Upon Lakeshore Setback Line by Applicant <br />and Neighbors <br />Hardcover ln\entory 75-250V250-500' Setback Area <br />Hardcover Plan <br />Existing Improvement/Survey <br />Proposed Improvement/Survey <br />Elevations <br />Lower Floor Plan <br />Main Level Floor Plan <br />Upper Level Floor Plan <br />Review of Application <br />The subject property meets the required area and width standanls of the LR-IC zoning district. <br />Structural coverage is not an issue, proposed at 11.9%. Hardcover in the 75-250' setback area <br />does not exceed the allowed 25% even with the inclusion of the boathouse area adjusted at <br />23.4%. The exclusion of the 20' Casco Point Road corridor has had an impact on hardcover <br />projections within the 250-500 ’ setback area. Hardcover in the original proposal was proposed <br />at 45.7% and has now been reduced at 38.9%. <br />The original proposal for redevelopment of the property presented to the Planning Commission <br />at their July meeting w’as tabled because of the intensity and number of variances sought by <br />applic.mts. The neighbors had also submitted written objection to the proposed encroachment <br />of the average lakeshore setback line. (Review Exhibit F-1, G-1 and H). <br />The existing residence. Exhibit L, is located approximately 24' in front of the average lakeshore <br />setback line. The encroaching portion of the principal structure consists of a lower level <br />principal structure addition with tw'o levels of upper decks. Mr. Theilmann, review Exhibit 1, <br />owner of residence identified as "D", has concern with the leapfrog effect of the average <br />lakeshore setback line. Theilmann noted that the Grundeen residence. Exhibit 1, house <br />designation C, would be rebuilt some day and that if the Hurd residence was installed 20' in <br />front of the average lakeshore setback line, this would have a major impact on Theilmann's <br />lakeshore views. <br />The houses along this stretch of shoreline are all located along a high bank and overlook <br />grassed lakeshore yards at an average depth of 175'. Planning Commission members noted the <br />new residence is more massive and would have more of an impact on the adjacent residences.