My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
09-09-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 12:28:35 PM
Creation date
9/5/2023 12:25:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#2166 - Janet Kieman <br />August 14. 1996 <br />Page 4 <br />Garage Addition <br />The proposed addition to the garage results in a structure that, on the plans, has a 49'x20.4’ footprint <br />or 999.6 s.f. Applicant ’s hardcover calculations indicate the garage at 1,029 s.f. The garage must <br />be kept less than 1.000 s.f. to not be considered an oversized accessory structure. Above 1,000 s.f, <br />it is subject to a 50 ’ street setback and a 30 ’ side setback, neither of which it could meet. <br />Assuming the garage is under 1,000 s.f, it still needs to meet a 15 ’ south side setback (side setback <br />as proposed is approximately 18 ’) and a 15 ’ street setback. The existing garage is 21.0' from the <br />street, but extending its west wall northward, the garage extends near the right-of-way, and w’ould <br />be lO.T from the street lot line at its northwest comer. This places the noihwest comer of the garage <br />nearly to the edge of the perceived shoulder of Co. Rd. 15. In order to meet the required 1 5' setback, <br />the garage addition would have to be offset to the east, or could be reduced to one additional stall <br />instead of two. <br />Note: The entire existing/proposed garage is within property noted on County plat maps as <br />"unknown parcel". The surveyor indicates that the propjerty owner likely needs to proceed with some <br />type of Judicial action to have this parcel added to the legal description. Until this occurs, the city <br />has no assurance that the existing/proposed garage is within applicants property. Dennis Hill at the <br />Hennepin County Property Descriptions Office has indicated they have no record of such action <br />pending. <br />Septic System Analysis <br />This house is part of the Bracketts Point "hotspot" neighborhood which has petitioned for installation <br />of municipal sewer as soon as possible. Assuming the City is successful in its currently proposed <br />MUSA boundary amendment, it is not impossible that municipal sewer could be provided to this <br />property through a project that could occur in 1997. Howev er, such project has not yet been ordered <br />nor designed, and municipal sewer is therefore not yet "guaranteed" to this property. <br />The existing septic system was reconstmeted in 1982 and consists of a lift station discharging to two <br />septic tanks and a 600 s.f drainfield located uphill north of the house. The drainfield was sized in <br />1982 by guesstimating a 1-15 minute per inch perc rate based on the soil textures encountered at the <br />site. Technically, this would require a drainfield sized at a range of 0.83 to 1.27 s.f of drainfield <br />bottom area per gallon per day. At an average requirement of 1.05 s.f per gallon per day, the system <br />likely can handle no more than 570 gallons per day ar.d may be slightly undersized for a four <br />bedroom house. On the other hand, if actual perc rate is in the 1-5 mpi range, requiring only 0.83 <br />s.f of trench per gallon per day, the system might handle up to 722 gpd or almost a 5 bedroom home.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.