09-09-1996 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 4 September 5, 1996 Zoning File #2166 __________ some agreement with the neighboring property owner regarding drainage routing. Existing 0-75 ’ hardcover is 6.0%. Applicant originally proposed a reduction to 5.6%, but Planning Commission recommended a revision/reduction to 3.9%, with which applicant has complied (see the revised terrace plan. E.xhibit C). In the 75-250’ zone, existing hardcover is 27.5%. Applicant proposes a minor increase to 27.6% (an additional 34 s.f.) which Planning Coiimission had no problem with. The existing house and proposed addition encroach as much as 26’ past the average lakeshore setback, however, impact on neighboring views of the lake is minimal or nonexistent. Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Conurission reviewed this application at their August 19th meeting and on a vote of 5-1 recommended approval (Peterson voting nay due to inadequate 0- 75 ’ trade-offs and average setback encroachment) subject to a number of conditions: 1. 5. The garage addition must be offset to meet the required 15’ street lot line setback (applicant has provided a plan meeting this requirement). 2. Limit the garage to no more than 1,000 s.f. footprint (applicant has complied). 3. Reduce proposed semicircular patio to 240 s.f. (applicant has complied). Hardcover removals required as originally proposed, with reconfiguration in 0-75 ’ zone not to exceed 3.9% and in 75-250’ zone, approval of 0.1% increa.se to 27.6%. House must be limited to proposed 4-bedroom design since existing septic system has a 4-bedroom capacity (no revisions are required to the rec room area, which is not to be used as a bedioom). 6. An advisory that this property should be granted no additional structure in the 0-7o' zone. 7. 9. That the applicant provide a grading and drainage plan for the property ’ giving special attention to the proposed diiveway area south of the garage (see Exhibits E & F). Thai the City Engineer review the impacts of the proposed additions and site revisions on the preliminary' sanitary’ sewer route location, also considering the need