My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
09-09-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 12:28:35 PM
Creation date
9/5/2023 12:25:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#2161 - Easley <br />Page 2 <br />Pertinent Facts <br />1. <br />2. <br />Applicants propose to replace their existing 18'x20' garage located 3.4’ from the road, with <br />a new 27.5'x22' garage located an average of 28' from the road. The new garage will face <br />the street as does the existing garage. <br />Applicants propose a side setback for the new gat age of approximately 3', to accomplish two <br />purposes; <br />A. Use new garage wall and extended retaining wall for channeling drainage along <br />property boundary past applicant's house. The neighboring property is higher and <br />portions of it drain toward applicants' property. <br />B. To protect two mature maple trees located along east side of property. <br />Applicants have provided a conceptual diagram (Exhibit H) indicating the location of a <br />future house to replace their existing house, which is mostly in the 0-75' zone. The concept <br />plan shows the new house meeting the 75' setback as well as the required 10' side setbacks. <br />This construction would be the subject of a future variance however, since applicants are not <br />proposing that construction in the immediate future, and have not finalized those plans. <br />The proposed garage and driveway to accommodate offstreet parking will result in a slight <br />hardcover increase of approximately 128 s.f in the 75-250' zone, or an increase from 38.1% <br />to 40.8%. A retaining wall system w ill also be needed east of the driveway. No sidewalk <br />access is proposed alongside the garage. <br />The requested variances are summarized as follows: <br />Existing Proposed <br />Allowed/ <br />Required Variance <br />Garage Street Setback 3.4’24'-31’30’6' <br />Garage Side Setback 2.5'(E)3’(W)10'r <br />Lot Coverage 16.8% <br />1,401 s.f. <br />19.7% <br />1,646 s.f. <br />15% <br />1,500 s.f. <br />(4.7%) <br />146 s.f <br />0-75’ Hardcover 23.3%No change 0%No change <br />75-250' Hardcover 38.1%40.8%25%15.8% <br />Acc. Struc. Height 12 ’?23*<House <br />.»
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.