08-26-1996 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITI' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON AUGUST I2» 1996 HIGHWOOD road . AFirR-THE-FACT Mabusth reiwrted that the application is for an after-the-fact variance for an upper level deck consisting of 65.5 s.f The deck is an extension of a 3* wde walkway deck and is located 2 r in front of the average lakeshore setback. The existing lower level deck is 3 1.6’. The upper level deck adds an additional 115 s f of new hardcover There is a slight structural coverage increase of 0.1% or 14.9 s f with the upper level deck The Planning Tommission asked the applicant to reduce the lower level deck by 50 .s f The proposed reduction is at 50.6 s f The appUcant had asked that the reduction occur at the comers of the lower level deck so as not to affect the existing supports. The overall reduction in hardcover is from 416% to 40% Plastic underlayment was found w^ inspecting the lower level deck and will be removed. Mabusth noted that the neighbors on both sides of this property were in favor of the application The applicant had no additional comments. Goetten was informed that a penalty fee was assessed as well as a building permit penalty. Callahan pked why the delay of time in the variance application from the time of deck construction Karkda reported that he had been busy dealing with personal problems. Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3748. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#5) #2134 ROBERT ALBRECHT, 1810 SHADY^OOD ROAD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3749 Robert Albrecht and his attorney. Bob Nlitchell, were present. Callahan inquired if the applicant wished to await the arrivTtl of Council Member Hun- before proceeding with review of the application, which Mitchell declined Gaffron reported that the Council gave conceptual approval at their July 8 meeting. At the July 22 meeting, the resolution for approval failed with a vote of 2:3. The application was then tabled to allow the applicant to consult with his attorney. Gaffron said a denial resolution was drafted, and the packet includes the approval resolution drafted prior to the tabling of the application as well. Callahan noted the inclusion of two surveys, one from the 1991 review and one provided by Mitchell J