07-22-1996 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 8,1996 (#7 - #2136 Greenfield Corporation - Continued) Kelley suggested that the road outlot not be platted. It wzs questioned what would happen if the developer of the other property did not wish to pay for the use of the access road. Mahusth said the City would take underlying easements. Kelley said this would then result in the road becoming a public roadway Gaffron said if lot 1 was pushed further down, the lots could have the appropriate widths Hurt suggested Outlot B be platted She said it should be under the control of whoever has control of Outlot A. Goetten commented if Outlot B was required, the City would be allowing two lots to be substandard and force developers to share an outlot. Hurr responded that the County said the access should be at that location. Callahan noted that the County must givt access to the lots Cook added that 50’ is still needed for access to the lot, arid it dees not change the frontage Callahan said a lot could be eliminated. Mabusth commented to plat only a driveway outlot would eiiminate width variances Callahan said the only way to have the development without a vtriance is to eliminate a lot. Pfennig said he would like to wo’k some mechanism out with the adjoining devdooer. Jabbour commented that acreage was only one building standard. If primary and secondary septic sites are not found, then there would only be one rite. Callahan asked if Outlot B was intended to serve the property to east as well as north from CoRd 84. Mabusth said the road outlot was to serve Outlot C, Bayview Fanns. Hurr said she would not be as concerned with the variance if safety of access was provided. Kelley asked if a larger blowup of the area could be seen and suggested tabling the application. Kelley moved, Jabbour seconded to table the Application. Jabbour asked to poll the Council for their current view. Hurr said she would like to review the rest of the development in the area Kelley said if Outlot B was eliminated, there would be no need for the variance. Callahan said he was concerned with tabling as the applicant has responded to prior direction given and is being asked to come back again. He would like to see no variances required. Goetten said her opinion is as previously stated Kelley noted that the developer has brought the problems upon himself when asking for a variance in the first place. Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0. i 8