Laserfiche WebLink
DattttSubject!Mayor Petarson a Orono Council Menbars Planning Comisaiofi Chalman ICallay Orono Planning Comiiiasion Manbara City Administrator BarnhardsonJaanna A. Mabusth, Building ( Zoning Administrator April 11, 1991#1636 Stava Tibbatts, 1810 Shadywood Road - Aftar-tha-fact Variancas - Public Hearing 7 <br />Partinant Ordinancas - <br />Saction 10.22, Subdivision 2 - After-the-fact lakeshora <br />hardcover variances. <br />0-75* Setback Area - 4,500 s.f. <br />Allowed ■ 0% <br />Existing ■ 178 s.f. or 3.95% <br />Approved in Resolution I1718-B (Exhibit D) <br />75-250' Setback Area - 13,500 s.f. (recently confirmed <br />by surveyor) <br />Total Lot Area • 18,000 s.f. (Exhibit H) <br />Allowed - 3,375 s.f. or 251 <br />Approved with Building Permit <br />7/12/85 - 2,109 s.f. or 19% <br />(existing house 534 s.f., addn 940 s.f., <br />porous block drive 635 s.f., no sidewalks or <br />decks, second floor deck, 49 s.f. not <br />included in hardcover inventory - see Exhibit <br />N) <br />Existing Per Recent Survey - 4,901.55 s.f. or 36.3% <br />Existing Per Staff Inspec. - 5,059 s.f. or 37.4%* <br />House ■ <br />Drive ■ <br />Sidewalk - <br />Street Side Deck ■ <br />Lakside Deck ■ <br />1,711 s.f. <br />2,809.85 <br />124 <br />154.7 <br />102 <br />Lower Level (second floor deck located above <br />not included) <br />Landscape Area - 115.5 <br />w/Plastic <br />Lakeside Deck Stairs • 42 <br />(3.5x12.5) <br />(# 1KNSection 10.25 - Side setback variance required for street side <br />deck. <br />Existing ■ 3'1" (approved per Resolution 11718-B) <br />Proposed ■ 3'1* <br />Variance ■ 6.9* or 69% <br />Zoning Pile #1636 April 11, 1991 Page 2 of 5List of ExhibitsExhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat MapExhibit Dl-3 - Resolution 11718-B, Approved 1/14/85 Exhibit E - Permit 15678, Issued 7/12/85 <br />Exhibit P - Hardcover Pact Sheet Submitted w/Building Permit <br />Exhibit G - Survey Submitted w/Building Permit <br />Exhibit H - Surveyor's Letter of 3/14/91 <br />Exhibit I - Hardcover Pact Sheet <br />Exhibit J - Hardcover Site Plan <br />Exhibit Kl-2 - Ploor Plan/Elevation - Street Side Deck <br />Exhibit L - Ploor Plan - Lakeside Area <br />Exhibit H - Staff Site Plan <br />Exhibit N - Elevation 2nd Ploor Lakeside Deck <br />Exhibit 0 - Resolution #1908, Approved 1/86 <br />Review of Application - <br />Although a building permit was issued in 1985 for the <br />proposed addition to the existing residence on the property, <br />applicant has only recently applied for a certificate of <br />occupancy. In the process of making the final inspection, the <br />Building staff noted variations from the approvals granted for <br />the development of this property in Resolution #1718-B (Exhibit <br />D1 through D3). The applicant was advised that he had obvious <br />hardcover problems and that applicant had constructed a deck <br />along the north side of the lot line where the above referenced <br />resoluton would have prohibited expansion. It was staff's <br />understanding that all new construction at that portion of the <br />property would have to meet the required 10' setback. The <br />applicant claimed to be confuased because it was his <br />understanding that he was only at 19% and the property was <br />approved for 25%. Please review Exhibit P, the hardcover fact <br />sheet that was submitted with the building permit. The 1985 <br />building permit covered a 2-story 22'x49' addition to the south <br />side of the structure that included an 8H'x6* second floor deck. <br />The permit was issued based on the use of porous blocks for the <br />driveway. Review Exhibit N, note the building permit did include <br />the second floor lakeside deck. Review Exhibits Kl through 2 and <br />L, the lakeside deck at 102 s.f. and the street side deck at <br />154.7 s.f. were not shown on the building plans. Note also that <br />the floor plans in the dinette area showed windows and not doors. <br />Doors were also not shown within the existing living room area. <br />The lakeshore deck does not encroach the 75' setback line nor an <br />average lakeshore setback line (Exhibit H). The structure would <br />not have required a hardcover variance at the time of the <br />issuance of a building permit even if they were included because <br />the driveway was to bo at a 635 s.f. hardcover.