07-08-1996 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINL^TES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMNOSSION NIEE i IN li held O n MAY 20, 1996 (A^4 - fl2i24 Rubcil Chailcs Aibrechl - Coiilinucu) Smith moved. Lindquist seconded, to deny approval of the after-the-fact deck. The stair landing was approved with the condition that the applicant work with Staff to meet the 90-100 sf compliance for .stair landing si7e Vote Ayes .S Nays 0 The applicant was informed that the application would go to the second Cou.ncil m.eetin<^ ir. June. It was noted for the record that the Planning Commission was not concerned with the stairway to the lake but would Uke to see the Citv work with the aoDlicant in meeting size reo,uirements (#5) #2135 PAUL AND SUE HEDLUND, 1575 LONG L.AKE BLVD. - VARLANCES - PUBLIC HEARLNG 8:28-9:12 P.M. The .Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The .Applica.nts was present. Gaftron reported that the property in question was a 3/4 acre lot. the bulk of which is located in the 0-7.5’ setback, with 17,600 .s f in the 0-7.5' sefhack and 11,000 s f in the 75- 250’ setback The house on the property' is small and mostly located within the 0-75’ setback. The single car garage e.ncroaches into the right-of-way. Gaffron said the proposal to purchase the property is contingent on approval of the additions. .A ji addition is proposed to the rear, non-lakeside of the house, but still partially in the 0-75' setback. A second story is also planned. The garage w'ill be removed and replaced by a 2-car attached garage. Gaftron informed the Planning Commission that the variances required for this proposal are for hardcover, side setback to the east, proposed at 18’ where 30' is required, and street setback. The attached garage requires a 30' street setback and is proposed at 1'. Gaftron said Staft' recom.mends a 10' setback to the street lot line. The norma! setback for a detached garage, when doors are to the side, is 10’. which Gaffron said should be strived for. Gaffron reported that the average depth of the lot is such that there is no buildable envelope The evi.sting house does not meet setback*; Any upward changes re.sults in visual impacts Gaffron said it should be noted that the height of the staicture be limited to 2 stories. If this limit was not placed in the resolution, the structure could be built to 2- I./2 stories. Any m-o.^’e than 2 stories would not fit the neighborhood and would be disproportionate from the street view'. A letter from the neighbor to the east stated his opposition to allowing a side setback less than the 30’ requirement. Gaffron said there could be ramifications to changing the garage to the other end of the house. 10