My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-24-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
06-24-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 11:10:08 AM
Creation date
9/5/2023 11:08:04 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />c. <br />4. <br />5. <br />The average lakeshore setback for this application has been defined as the <br />lake setback of the neighboring house to the east, since the neighboring <br />property to the west is nearly one-quarter mile distant. The proposed <br />removal of the existing garage and subsequent construction of a new <br />attached garage and room additions will result in less encroachment of <br />the average lakeshore setback than currently exists. The existing <br />encroachment is approximately 90', and this will reduce to 75'. The <br />neighboring property will have no additional views encroached by the <br />proposed construction, and may have additional views of the lake opened <br />up by the proposal. <br />The existing garage encroaches within 123’ of the OHWL of Lake <br />Classen. The proposal to remove that garage and construct new additions <br />which will encroach only as near as 140' from Lake Classen, is a <br />positive improvement to the conformity of the property in relation to <br />setback from Lake Classen. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br />by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety <br />and welfare of the conununity. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />ser\’e as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br />property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 3 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.