Laserfiche WebLink
MlNUTF.r. THE PIJVNNING CO“MISlUO** MF.ETINU ItET.O SRPTEMDER 8, 1*^87 <br />•117^ RICHARD PUTNAM <br />2765 CASCO POINT ROAD <br />VARIANCES <br />REFERRED HACK PROM COUNCIL <br />Mr. Richard Tutnan war; pr<^'-.cnt for this matte*'. <br />Acting Chairman Drll''vs explained that she was th'- <br />represent.ativo at the Council meeting when this wa** <br />presented. Ihe Plannino Commission originally denied thi'" <br />application 4-1 because the Comitission had a lot of questio* • <br />and reservation about this application, and Mr. Putnam wishe’ <br />to not be tabled Icr ■* month but be sent on to Council. The <br />general concensus from the Council was there was no stronr <br />feeling about how the Planning Commission felt on this issu*. <br />As it was brought before the Council, the need for ar <br />additional variance war. determined by staff and at that poir.. <br />it was recommended that it be brought back to the Planrin"* <br />Commission for further review. <br />Asst Planning & Tonine A !- inistratf>r Gaffron explained that <br />the original review of this application presumed that th** <br />'_jqo of the dedicated read came to a point further cast, bu* <br />in fact the dedicated roadway cuts into the property more <br />than expected which doer, change the street setback for the <br />garage from 38' to 20*. The property to the south has the <br />same portion of dedicated roadway over their property and to <br />the north it is questionable. The road is actually eff-fcet <br />from the corridor quite a bit. The major change resulting ir <br />the 250-500' 2one ir. actually smaller. In calculating <br />hardcover for the property within the dedicated right-of-wav*» <br />which yields a hardcover percentage reduction from 85t down <br />to 40%; or, if applicart's property for hardcover purposes <br />does not include the dcviicated right-of-way the hardcover <br />reduction percentages arc from % down to __%. <br />Mr. Putnam noted that nothing has changed but th'* <br />interprotatior. of the plat. <br />Asst Planning fi Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained if the <br />garage faces the street, it requires a 30* setback.^ The <br />attachment cf it to the house also means the entire ^0 from <br />the right-of-way where .’i’’' is required. He noted that pej <br />the drafted resolution, pane 3, 4 variances are required ( <br />if the 250-500' area is separate). <br />Johnson felt ‘.hat the Commission had denied the cpplicatio.g <br />once and he feels t.hat the application should not have be:n <br />brought back to the Commission. <br />3 4N3i/iin3oa ivNioiao aooo