Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITV’ COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1996 <br />(Park Commission Comments - Continued) <br />Goetten asked for an update at the next Council meeting noting the large amount of time <br />committed by the Park Commission She felt it was important to extend the faith given in <br />the trail plan and proceed with constniction unless there are changes to impede its <br />progress. <br />Callahan asked Moorse to place the bike trial on the next Council meeting agenda. <br />Flint informed the Council that the Commission is moving forward with the Park and <br />Open Space Plan The Park Commission is meeting on May 24 for its own work session <br />and w ill be ready to meet with the Council in the beginning of June to solicit their input. <br />A time for the work session between the Council and Commission will be set at that time <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />Commissioner Hawn said she stood by the report as submitted and had no further <br />comments <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />There were no public comments <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT <br />(#4) #2088 WINFIELD STEPHENS, 3770 BAYSIDE ROAD - VARIANCES - <br />RESOLUTION #3720 <br />Mr Stephens w;.s present. <br />Mabusth reported that the vacation of the 30' alley to the west of the property has been <br />completed The original comprehensive application involved both the current and former <br />owner for both the vacation and variance application for proposed improvements. The <br />Planning Commission had recommended the vacation be completed prior to review of tire <br />variance portion of the application <br />Mabusth reviewed the improvements proposed for the property consisting of a grade <br />level and second story additions to house, detached garage, and roofed deck There was <br />a question on whether the original stone foundation would support a new second story <br />residence The building inspector approved the use of the original foundation with a new <br />support wall at the easst wall Mabusth noted that the applicant has met with the <br />neighbors to tlie w est of Landmark Drive, and they have agreed to a 15 ’ setback from the <br />west lot line where an existing garage encroaches 1 ’ to 2’ into Landmark Drive right-of- <br />wav