My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
05-13-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 10:12:05 AM
Creation date
9/5/2023 10:07:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-t ~t -T-f- T ~T~T ~j~*l 1 <br />'-•t l.J <br />\ <br />"rI <br />r <br />MTNl.TES OF THE ORONO PLAN'SLNG COMMlplON <br />MEETING HELD ON NO\'EMBER 20. 1995 <br />(.74 - .=20S5 Depannieni of Naiurai Resources - Conimueai <br />Gaffron inquired about the construction schedule. Linnell said it would ne.\t §o ^ the <br />Council in December. If no maior chanees were necessary-, the hnal clans be <br />drafted in Januar>’ and February with bidding for early spring. Construction would begin <br />in Mav and comcleted durina the summer. <br />No formal action was required at this meeting. <br />Wigen asked if a motion could be made on signage regarding trespassing. He was told <br />these concerns would be addressed by Staff <br />Lindquist asked that the comments be passed on to the Council. Peterson closed the <br />public information meeting. <br />(#5) M20S8 WINFIELD STEPHENS, 3770 BAYSIDE ROAD - <br />VARIANCESA^ACATION OF PUBLIC ROAD - 9:06-9:35 P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and /Mfidavit of Publication were noted. <br />The .Applicant was present. <br />Mabusth reported that the application was for the vacation of a 30' alley and setback <br />variances for maior additions to existing residence The nronertv is made uo ot 4 secarate <br />parcels and involves an improvement plan. Existing on the property is a 1-1/2 story home <br />with a uarauc that is located totally w ithin the 30’ alley. The improvement corisists of tw o <br />options^, option U\ involves an addition to the south side and option #2, an addition to the <br />east The Stall'memo was said to discuss the setbacks and hardcover tor the property. <br />Peterson said there would appear to be no major concern as long as the applicant was able <br />to acquire the alley. <br />Mabusth advised from calls she received, it appeared that the adjacent o^ers may make <br />claim to the alley. Mabusth said she had spoken with Dennis Hill at the County, who said <br />the entire alley would probably be granted to the applicant as owner of lots - and 3. <br />Mabusth said'she had spoken with Hill again after calls had been received from the <br />neighbors, and he advised that the matter may have to be funher studied. Hill informed <br />Mabusth if the neighbors pressed for a piece of the alley, these claims may e raise unng <br />a required legal proceeding. <br />Peterson asked if the application was not one step ahead of itself He asked if Staff was <br />awaiting information on utilities. The City Engineer reported there were no sewer lines <br />encroaching the alley, and there are no power poles. <br />T1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.