05-13-1996 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON APRIL 15, 1996 (M9 - #2128 Orono Hockey Boosters - Continued) Engebretson said the hours of operation during non-ice times have not been set He suggested the hours of 7 00 a m to 9 00 pm He said the purpose of the building during this time will be for da\lime sports, recreation and meetings Engebretson said the non ice time will be between March 15 and September 15 with the possibility of year-around ice in the future Prime time ice hours will run from 5 30 a m to 11 30 p m Engebretson repon^^ that there will be no hazardous material used when asked about pollution problems Mabusth noted that a calculation of signage will need to be done The allow able signage is 12 s f, and the application will require an area signage variance VV'hen asked how the sign imprinted into the concrete will be viewed at night, Roseboom said an indirect light will be on the sign There will also be a 4'x4’ medallion window with lighting Engebretson said arenas usually do not operate with lighted s’gns dunng the evening hours Roger Zeeb asked about access from Old Crystal Bay Road Peterson said the bond referendum, which was turned dow n, had addressed issues of correcting parking and access Peterson said the school was considering to restrict and reconfigure Old Crystal Bay Road between CoRd 6 and Hwy 12 and make it part of the school campus. This would have involved an internal roadway. Peterson moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve Application #2128 with Staff recommendations 1-7 V'ote Aves 5, Navs 0 Grabek inquired if the shadow imprint and additional soil borings were part of the motion. Peterson informed him that the Council will make the determining decision. It was noted that the application will go to the Council on April 22 regarding the variance to the Highway 12 moratorium (#10) #2129 JOHN PENDLETON, 350 NORTH ARM LANE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PI BLIC HEARING The application was withdrawn at the request of the applicant. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS (#11) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION There were no ac. litional issues discussed