Laserfiche WebLink
1*^ <br />I <br />« <br />> <br />1 <br />I <br />% <br />% <br />« <br />1 <br />d <br />» <br />* <br />> <br />Determination of AvaUable Land within the MUSA <br />nie aoDTOach taken in this study reUed upon the assumption contained in the Metro[»iitan <br />Su^:^the Minnesota Legisianne, for the Twin <br />^loSes of the Metro Area. Using this growth assumption. 23 deveiopmg commumt.es <br />Laily Ide and partiaUy outside the existing MUSA (Figure 1) were selected lor tins smdy^ <br />lu of these communities are expetiencng growth and are considered ‘deveiopmg accordmg <br />the Meuopolitan Council. Although there are a few additional commumties with land both <br />inside and outs.de the MUSA, it was determined that the selected con^umues *e <br />best representation of land supply in the developing portions of *e Me^pol.m <br />found a total of 15,956 acres of unplatted residential land and an add.ttontU 10,676 <br />platted lots within the MUSA of these 23 communities. <br />Twin Cities Metro Area <br />Interview Communities <br />FIGURE 1 <br />i a <br />1 <br />> a. <br />y <br />; <br />j 'i _ <br />I <br />LT <br />* I <br />'t • <br />-'rHziy <br />'N I <br />T <br />Couvnumllcf Inttnri <br />iwroti <br />fctJwidWFwW <br />mlMU&A