Laserfiche WebLink
To;Mayor Callahan <br />City Council Members <br />Ron Moorse. City Administrator <br />From:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & 2Joning Administrator <br />Date;April 16, 1996 <br />Subject:Builders Association Study - Urban Land Supply <br />The news media in the last few days have been reporting on a study sponsored by the Builders Association <br />of the Twin Cities entitled "The High Cost of Sprawl: A Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Urban Land Supply <br />Analysis and Recommendations for Managing Grow th". Orono was one of 23 metro area urban fringe’ cities <br />studied bv a team that included, among others. Dahleren. Shardlow & Uban and Bonestroo & Associates. <br />The study makes a number of conclusions, among them the following: <br />Within the 23 cities that make up the metro development fringe, there is insufficient <br />undeveloped land within the current MUSA to accomodate projected growth over the <br />next 25 years, and in fact it will be exhausted in 3 years. <br />Infill development and redevelopment within the already developed urban core will <br />not accomodate the expected growth, even with substantial local government efforts toward <br />redevelopment. <br />Met Council should expand the MUSA now and should adopt flexible, simplified <br />procedures for approving MUSA expansions. <br />'Urban Transition Areas* , defined as urban reserve areas within the planned sewer <br />service area, should be defined and preserved for future urbanization, i.e. for future <br />development densities of 2 units per acre or greater. <br />Unsewered large-lot development (similar to what we have in Orono and which is <br />common at the current urban fringe) should be approved only in conjunction with a <br />'ghost plat' of future urban overlay to allow its future conversion to urban densities. <br />The study seems to come to the same conclusion that we have experienced from Met Council staff, that <br />Orono's 2-acre and 5-acre low density development is an inefficient use of land. It concludes that over <br />130,CKX) acres of land in the metro fringe between the current MUSA and the "Ultimate MUSA" (the area <br />which can be served by existing or planned wastewater facilities) has been developed at low densities which <br />will accomodate far fewer houses than if it had been developed at urban densities (2.5 units per acre). This <br />has. per the report, "already added between $650 million and $1.33 billion to the cost of developing the <br />remaining portions of the Ultimate MUSA." <br />Attached is a copy of the Executive Summary of the report. I have the entire ISO-t* page report available if <br />you would like to see it. <br />A j>k..