My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-19-1997 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
05-19-1997 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2023 4:23:40 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 4:16:03 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
414
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• • <br />REQUEST FOR COUNXTL ACTION "'ir <br />■■ <br />DATE; Nl^ber 7, *{'§§6 <br />ITEM NO; /O •v‘-> <br />Department Approval; <br />Name Ron Moorse <br />Title City Administrator <br />Item Description; <br />Administrator Reviewed; <br />............................................. <br />Agenda Section; <br />Administrator’s Report <br />if <br />Telecommunications Tower and Antenna Regulation <br />In response to requirements placed on cities by the Federal Telecommunications Act regarding <br />telecommunications towers and antennas, the city placed a moratorium on the construction and <br />installation of new telecommunications towers and antennas in the city. The moratorium, which <br />expires on December 24, 1996, is to provide the city with an opportunity to determine how best <br />to respond to proposals regarding telecommunication towers and antemias within the <br />requirements set out by the Telecommunications Act; and to make any changes needed to the <br />city’s current ordinances relating to telecommunications towers and antennas. <br />The key requirement of the telecommunications act is that cities may not prohibit or have the <br />effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services. From a practical standpoint, <br />what this means is that cities can not prohibit towers and antennas from being constructed within <br />their city boundaries if this prohibition would make it impossible for telecommunications vendors <br />to provide wireless service to customers within the cities. <br />The provision of wireless services depends on the installation of a network of antennaa'to create <br />a continuous coverage area. These antennas need to be located as close together as one-quarter <br />mile if they are located on lower towers (80 feet in height) and in densely populated areas. <br />They can be separated by as much as 4 miles »f located on higher towers (120 feet in height) and <br />in low density areas. Although Orono has a krge land area, it would be possible for wireless <br />service providers to complete a network of antennas serving the majority of the Orono area <br />without the necessity of locating antennas in the city of Orono. If antennas were placed in <br />surrounding cities that are more densely populated and have substantial commercial u. s, Orono <br />could be almost completely covered by the network. The only area that appears to be outside <br />of the coverage area would be the west central part of the city. <br />rnrrp.nt Citv Regulations <br />The current city regulations allow telecommunications towers or antenna structures in two zomng <br />districts-the industrial zone and B-1 zone. The city’s industrial zone is located on the south side <br />of Highway 12 betw'een Old Crystal Bay Road and the Long Lake border. The industrial zone <br />ordinance requires that a telecommunications tower/antenna can only be allowed if it is accessory <br />to a principle use. It also limits the height to a maximum of 65 feet. The B-1 zoning district <br />allows an antenna structure as a conditional use. The city’s B-1 zoned property is located in the <br />Navarre area.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.