Laserfiche WebLink
TO: <br />FROM; <br />DATE: <br />Mayor and City Council <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />October 28, 1996 <br />SUBJECT: Telecommunications Tower and Antenna Policy and Ordinance <br />Background on Personal Communications Services (PCS) and the Need for a Municipal <br />Telecommunications Policy and Ordinance <br />The Federal Communications Commission has awarded two licenses for wireless digital personal <br />communications services (PCS) for the north central region of the US including Minnesota. PCS <br />digital communications services are expected to enhance and compete with current cellular <br />analog phone services. PCS will enable individuals and businesses to use secure, accurate over <br />the air paging, voice, FAX, video and data transmission with the advantage of a single phone <br />number available at any location to which the transmission is sent. <br />Receiving and transmitting the PCS signals will require an extensive infrastructure with many <br />more sites required for PCS antennas, towers, and smaller repeaters to provide the flexibility <br />and universality of service necessary for PCS to be fully operational in this area. Many more <br />sites will be required for PCS equipment than the type and number of towers required for <br />cellular communications. Because of this, cities need to be prepared to consider local land use, <br />zoning, lease agreements and other site related considerations to enable them to respond to <br />requests for PCS tower and antenna sites. <br />Extent of Municipal Control <br />The Federal Telecommunications Act originally included language that would have ovirridden <br />municipal control over telecommunications towers. This language was removed shortly before <br />passage of the Act. However, the Act does place three important limitations on local <br />governments. <br />1.Cities may not "unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent <br />services." <br />2. Cities may not "prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal <br />wireless services." <br />3.Cities may not regulate personal wireless services "on the basis of the environmental <br />effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the <br />FCC’s regulations concerning such emissions." <br />The key limitation in terms of limiting the city ’s control over telecommunications towers and <br />antennas is the requirement that cities may not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the <br />1