Laserfiche WebLink
10. The applicant's architect has submitted a letter that states that the existing foundation will <br />need to be removed. A new foundation should meet the side yard setback requirements. <br />11. The adjacent resident appeared at the previous Planning Commission and objected to the <br />height. <br />Staff* Recommendation <br />Tliere are multiple variances for the proposed residence created by the uniqueness of this lot being <br />narrow and the location of the lagoon. The lakeshore setback, and average lakeshore setback, and <br />hardcover requirements as applied to this lot restrict redevelopment of the site. Staff is concerned <br />about the impact of redevelopment on the floodway and flood fringe district. A conditional use <br />permit is also required for excavation or fill. Demolition and new construction on the subject <br />property would be required to take precautions to protect the shoreline and the lagoon. <br />Staff recommends that the proposed strucmre be located behind the 75 ’ setback line and conform to <br />the 10' side yard setback on the east property line. The applicant also needs to submit the fee for a <br />conditional use permit. <br />U2221 Sven Wasberg and Arlene DeCandia <br />3115 North Shore Dr.-Variances <br />4/21/97 <br />page~6