My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-25-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
03-25-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2023 4:15:25 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 4:10:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning FUe #2063 <br />Sq)tember 7, 1995 <br />Page 2 <br />5. Hardcover in the 0*75 ’ zone is 4.0%, comprised as follows: <br />6. <br />7. <br />House <br />Deck <br />Patio <br />Rock beds with plastic <br />Retaining wall <br />434 s.f. <br />423 s.f. <br />170 s.f. <br />107 s.f. <br />8 s.f. <br />1,142.s.f. (4.04%) <br />Hardcover in the 75-250 ’ zone is 31.1%, of which 7.8% is landscape beds with plastic <br />or fabric. <br />Applicants received a variance in 1988 to construct a small sunroom on the street side <br />of the house. That approval required removal of a 146 s.f. portion of the concrete patio <br />on the lakeside of the house. That portion was removed. <br />Discussion <br />The existing deck was constructed almost twenty years ago per previous City approvals, <br />and applicants propose to replace it in kind. It was noted during the 1988 variance approval that <br />applicants had never removed the 20’ x 20’ concrete slab at the walkout level, which they had <br />agreed to in 1976. As pan of the 1988 variance, applicants were required to remove Uie <br />southerly one-third of that slab, but were allowed to keep the remaining 14 ’ x 20’ due to an ice <br />build up problem in that area (see documentation from 1988 and 1976 variances). <br />Per City policy as recently reiterated by the City Council, excessive hardcover contained <br />in plastic or fabric-lined landscape beds should not be considered in variance applications. <br />Council’s intent is that applicants be required to remove such excesses as a matter of course. <br />Therefore, the rock and plastic in the 0-75 ’ zone (adjacent to the west end of the house and in <br />a small part of the free-standing rock bed west of the house) should be removed. Although no <br />work is proposed in the 75-250 ’ zone, arguably that rock and plastic should also be removed. <br />There may be justification to not remove the rock and plastic adjacent to the house where it <br />serves a drainage purpose, but the free-standing rock beds (portions of which are not included <br />in the calculations because they are in the right-of-way) could be made non-hardcover. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Should additional portions of the concrete patio be removed? <br />2. What portion of the rock and plastic on the property should be removed?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.