My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-25-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
03-25-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2023 4:15:25 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 4:10:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF i*HE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 20, 1996 <br />(#8 - #2108 Norbert Johnson - Continued) <br />Schrocder asked what was the purpose of Garden Lane Mabusth said it was platted but <br />currently serves no property. Mabusth said 4 undeveloped parcels within the surrounding <br />Tonkaview plat need access and sewer and noted the opportunity at this time to gain an <br />easement for the sewer. <br />Mabusth outlined the drainageway for the area. There is one major drainageway which <br />drains to the northeast and one along the shared lot line at the south to Wildhurst During <br />the review of an earlier subdivision, Mabusth said the Engineer asked for a 50-75' wide <br />drainage easement over the ravine Schroeder asked if this would still result in a buildable <br />lot. Mabusth said as long as there is at least 1/2 acre contiguous land in Lot 3, it is <br />considered buildable. If a backlot is created, the access cannot cross the ravine area <br />according to the flood plain ordinance <br />Schroeder asked the applicant if he had anything to add Johnson said his interest was <br />strictly limited to the parcel under consideration only It is his plan to sell the lots, build <br />homes, and also live there It was noted that he is not a professional developer. <br />Mabusth brought attention to the blutf area noting the need for a surveyor to define the <br />bluff area in the grading plan. Johnson said he understood the bluff issue. <br />During public comments. Gary Welsh, 1214 Wildhurst, inquired about the proposed <br />access road off Wildhurst, w hich would be located close to his property, and questioned <br />the straight uphill look of the road Mabusth said Staff was out on site and tound no <br />problems with sight lines for curb cuts Welsh asked if Staff has reported to the applicant <br />on the stormwater runoff problems Mabusth said Exhibit F addressed the stormwater <br />issue, questioning whether the project would intensity the storage of runoff for the si'e or <br />if an off-site improvement would be necessary Welsh asked if the developer received <br />input from the Staff on the preliminary sketch Mabusth reported that a stormwater <br />retention area is needed for the project, and the developer is responsible for providing <br />retention She noted that the runoff cannot leave the site at a greater rate than at its <br />undeveloped rate Welsh asked if Staff has studied the impact of the runoft'since the <br />application has been made Mabusth said it has not yet been done for the sketch plan but <br />will be as part of the formal application process and noted awareness of the problems <br />Schroeder added that the property is steep and noted the need to understand the is.sue and <br />consider the stormwater manauement. <br />Sandy Rasmussen, Wildhurst Trail, asked if the proposed road was not w ider than <br />necessary at 66' with a 120' diameter culdesac Mabusth said the code calls tor a 50' wide <br />road with a 100’ diameter noting the plan would be amended. Rasmussen asked if it <br />would be the intention to minimize the road size. Mabusth said the road size would be an <br />issue for discussion as well as storm sewers for the road. <br />26
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.