Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 20, 1996 <br />(#5 - #2109 Todd Smith - Continued) <br />Smith moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of side and rear variances for a <br />3-season porch with the provision that the applicant understands that no future structural <br />coverage would be approved without a matching removal to maintain the level of <br />coverage as it now stands Schroeder noted that this would not bind a future commission <br />Mabusth said the request would be passed on to the Council Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />(#6 - #2110 JOAN DAYTON, 2465 FRENCH LAKE ROAD - VARIANCES - <br />PCBLIC HEARING 7:22-7:38 P.M. <br />The Cenitlcate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Bob Da\lon was present <br />Mabusth reported that the property in question consists of Lots I, 2, 3 of the Johnson <br />French Lake 2nd Addition, lakeshore lots adjacent to French Lake South Basin. A <br />redefinition of the North Basin of French Lake reclassified the area to the north as ^ <br />wetlands in 1992. Now, instead of a 150' setback firom an environmental lake, a 26' <br />setback is required from the wetlands. This results in an improvement to the building <br />envelope for Lot I and has opened up the 75-250' zone for Lot 2 Mabusth noted that a <br />I980's application granted a permit for a deck. Up to 1992, the 75' setback was required <br />for new construction 40 s f of the deck and 37 s f of the structure encroaches into the 0- <br />75' setback zone Now the entire house is located in the 75-150' zone The shoreland <br />regulations now require a 150' setback from the OHWL at 931. This results in the entire <br />home being non-conforming and the need for a variance application for any additions to <br />the home From the 75-150' setback, there is no structural improvement allowed but a <br />grade level patio or landscaped area underlaen with plastic, etc., would be allowed Non- <br />structural hardcover is now deemed allowable, though not structural, and non-structural <br />hardcover can be considered conforming. <br />The applicant seeks a hardcover variance in the 75-250' zone and lakeshore setback <br />variance for both of the planned additions. The dining room is 88' from the natural <br />environmental lake The 3-season porch is 86' from the lake In reviewing the hardcover <br />facts as lots are not combined, there is an excess in the 75-250' zone within just Lot 2 <br />Ihe 75-250’ area of this lot exceeds the allowed hardcover by 4 l®o at 29. l®o .Mabusth <br />said the applicant should be given the opportunity to consider all options before legally <br />combining properties The applicant was to be asked how he wished to handle this matter <br />of hardcover excess on Lot 2 <br />22