Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 20, 1996 <br />(f<l - ^2017 John O’Sullivan - Continued) <br />Mabusth said Gustafson is concerned with the traOic lanes and the need for additional area <br />for a right turn lane. Coen said the parking and standard dimensions were discussed with <br />Glenn Cook. O'Sullivan said he spoke with Gustafson and asked for detail and was told <br />Gustafson’s remarks were only an obser\ ation as he had not closely studied the plan. <br />Mabusth noted that this w’as not what Gustafson's report advised the City Staff. <br />Hawn inquired about the car wash operation with the projected use of 50 gallons of water <br />per car and 170 cars washed daily O’Sullivan said the system will treat the water before <br />sending it to the retention pond and would go into the sanitary sewer system He noted <br />that all chemicals used would be biodegradable Coen added that the outside drain would <br />catch the water dripping from the cars and send it to the sanitary sewer Thompson also <br />noted the driers in the car wash which would minimize the dripping Hawn said the <br />amount of water used per car wash seemed to be a large amount. O'Sullivan said the <br />amount was moderate <br />Lindquist remarked that, although he recognized what the applicant was attempting to <br />accomplish, the different uses appeared to be alot for such a small lot and questioned the <br />need The question also arose whether the car wash was a principal or accessory' use. <br />The car wash as proposed was considered a principal use <br />Lindquist asked if 35% of the lot w ould be hardcover but was told only a small portion of <br />property was included in the hardcover zone. <br />Schroedcr inquired about the function of the B-1 . Mabusth commented that as long as <br />stormwater retention was provided, the project would meet the use and retention <br />requirements This was theoretical as the facts have not been reviewed. Mabusth <br />informed Lindquist that the calculations would be reviewed before anv approval was made <br />of the application. <br />Schfoeder said he saw a difference in the use from the one property with a deli, auto <br />repair, and oil change with the number of cars that would frequent from a restaurant use. <br />The restaurant w ould present a maximum number of cars moving through the |)roperty at <br />certain busv time penods Schroeder said he could view the project without the car wash. <br />O’Sullivan told Schroeder that when analyzed, the car wash was necessary He felt the <br />itensity would be reduced with two sites providing similar products He did not believe he <br />would uain new business and would not be as equally busy