My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-25-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
03-25-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2023 4:15:25 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 4:10:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
•> <br />•2'. f <br />CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. ^^51_____ <br />A RESOLUTION GR.\NTING V'ARIANCES <br />TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br />SECTIONS 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B). 10.22, SUBDIVISION <br />and 10.56. SUBDIVISION 16 (L) <br />FILE NO. 2084 <br />vvHFRFAS Thomas R McCune (hereinafter "the applicant") is the ov\-ner oi* sss «-—-«• > <br />and legally described as follows; <br />Exhibit A anached (hereinafter "the property ’); and <br />WHEREAS, .he aoplican. has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal <br />zoom, C0de"s“e!fn' I— to ^ perrn,.^ a”setu <br />garage/bedrootn.'bath addiuon to be ocatc located 2T from the side lot line where <br />is normally required, and construction ° wtions 10.22. Subdivision 2 and 10.56, <br />a 30' setback is normally required and a \anance ^ ■- ^ hardcover <br />Subdivision 16 (L) to allow 26.7% haracover in the 75-50 zone only <br />is normally allowed. <br />Minnesota; <br />1. <br />j. <br />NOW. therefore , be it resolved by Ute City Cornell of Orono <br />findings <br />This application was reviewed as Zoning File =2084. <br />The property is located in the LR-IA Single Family Lakeshore Residentta. <br />Zoning District. <br />The Orono Planninc Commission reviewed this application ^ <br />W5 and recommended approval of die proposed variances based upon th. <br />following findings; <br />The nroposed side setback of 10' for the garage and 2T for <br />instead of Ute required 30'. is consistent with other development tn the <br />neiiihborhood. <br />Pace 1 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.