Laserfiche WebLink
10. The applicant’s architect has submitted a letter that states that tlie existing foundation will <br />need to be removed. A new foundation should meet the side yard setback requirements. <br />11. The adjacent resident appeared at the previous Planning Commission and objected to the <br />height. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />There are multiple variances for the proposed residence created by the uniqueness of this lot being <br />narrow' and the location of the lagoon. The lakeshore setback, and average lakeshore setback, and <br />hardcover requirement.' as applied to this lot restrict redevelopment of the site. Staff is concerned <br />about the impact of redevelopment on the floodway and flood fringe district. A conditional use <br />permit is also required f>r excavation or fill. Demolition and new construction on the subject <br />property would be required to take precautions to protect the shoreline and the lagoon. <br />Staff recommends that the proposed structure be located behind the 75' setback line and conform to <br />the 10' side yard setback on the east property line. The applicant also needs to submit the fee for a <br />conditional use permit. <br />U222I Sven Washerg and Arlene DeCanJia <br />3115 Ncrlh Shore Dr.-Variances <br />4/21/07 <br />page—6