Laserfiche WebLink
IVUNUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 12,1996 <br />(#17) REPLACEMENT OF nSHING PIER DOCKS <br />Moorse provided information requested by the CouncU regarding the life expectancy and <br />the winter transportation and storage of the fishing pier docks being considered for <br />replacement purposes. There is a minimum of 20 year life on the all aluminum, both deck <br />and structure, docks. The docks will be transported by either towing or by a flat bed <br />trailer, which the City has for such uses, to the Public Works rear yard area. The docks <br />will be 32’ in length, which does not exceed the 40 ’ maximum allowed for towing. <br />Hurr said the memo should state that the docks should be transported, not can be. <br />Kelley asked if there was an annual maintenance plan. Gerhardson ^d he did not expect <br />there to be any maintenance required. The docks are painted but with a paint that should <br />not wear oflf. <br />It was noted that the current docks are in six 8’ sections. Gerhardson said he did not <br />order any longer docks due to the need and ability for transportation Kelley asked how <br />the height of the docks can be changed, Gerhardson said this can be accomplished on <br />shore. <br />Kellev inquired about theft proofing of the docks. Gerhardson said there will be <br />removable hitches. He also said that stabilizer posts are used to anchor the docks. <br />It was questioned whether there w as a possibility for more accidents with an aluminum <br />type of dock. Gerhardson said the dock has rounded edges and has a non-slip surface. <br />He said the chance for injury was no greater than that of the current wood docks. <br />Hurr moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the purchase of two Hewitt 4 ’x32' straight <br />docks from Eckloff*Docks at a cost of S3,538 07 to be funded from the Park Fund. <br />Vote Aves 4, Nays 0. <br />(#18) ESTABLISH PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR ALLOCATION OF CDBG <br />FUNDS <br />Moorse reported that a date needed to be established for a public hearing regarding the <br />allocation of the annua! CDBG grant The allocation amount is approximately the same <br />as for the past year Moorse noted the recommendations made by Staff for the CDBG <br />allocation. He brought to the attention of the Council the reduction in the human service <br />area. The County has u.rected that human services expenditures not exceed 20% of the <br />total grant amount. This has caused reductions in the grant amounts for human service <br />agencies. <br />12