My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-12-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
02-12-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2023 3:52:18 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 3:47:36 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
513
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO.o o o <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October 18, 1993, <br />and recommended approval of the proposed variance, based upon the followmg <br />findings: <br />A At iust over 16.000 s.f. in area, the combined lots contams substantial <br />area for construction of single family residence without the requirement <br />for any other variances to the zoning chapter. <br />B. Municipal sewer is available and assessed to the property. <br />C Developed lot sizes in the neighborhood range from 0.14 acre to 1.5 acres <br />of dry land, averaging about 0.55 acres. The combination of Lots 8 and <br />9 at 0.37 acre vields a lot size that is not inconsistent with other lots m e <br />neighborhood. <br />D. Their is no other land available for purchase in order to make the lot size <br />conforming. <br />The Citv Council has considered this application including the fmdings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, repons by City staff, counts <br />by the applicant and the effect of the proposed vanance on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the community. <br />The Citv Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are <br />to it and do not applv generally to other propeny in this zoning aistnct, m <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conduions. light air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, wou . ' <br />ser\'e as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary ° _ <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substa^ual proper^ <br />right of the applicant: and would be in keeping with the spirit an in ei <br />Zoriing Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />K <br />frnrnm^^
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.