Laserfiche WebLink
minutes of the ORONO planning COl^SSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 16, 1996 <br />(#6 - Proposes Zoning Amendment - Continued) <br />Lindquist asked how many ^ 'mpikariom'thiA n^this amendment Gaffion said there have hew 2-3 appUcatiore wni s« <br />required variances if a complete table had originally been adopted. He not^ m^ l» <br />™^ons have me. die tSile standards and did no. need a <br />r^t of an amendment would be a reduction in the number °f ^ ~uld be <br />Lindquist said the problem he s^ that if a stnicture was over .000 s.f. i. stdl could be <br />objectionable and should be reviewed. <br />Hawn said if the char, was followed and a buil^g was <J-^ " rase by*^'” <br />envision what people are designing. Hawn said she would 1 ,ju^-000sf and <br />cSTon comment^ that today at 10 acres, oa^ceJs <br />asked if she was suggesting stopping at that ^“'^^^id^he wa? referring to individualSC s <br />continue to review others. Lindquist agreed. <br />Schroeder asked if the Staff felt they were overburdened by this limitation. Both Mabusth <br />LdGafifon said that was not the case, that the number of variances is mmimal. <br />l-ecor^nr that the Council be advised the Planning Commission does not see a need to <br />revise the tables. <br />Vote: Ayes 4. Nays 0.