02-12-1996 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

on. ion Zoning File #2102 January 10,1996 Page 3 Applicants propose the dredpng be at approximately fflling of the bank adjacent to the wetland. P ^ . f ,|,e 3,^3 taken before the 12-13%. Review Exhibits B and C. applicant has also p o^deo^^^^ snows. Staff met with the applicants on s''® ujgy„ Applicant is concerned with the sharp wall has completely failed and erosion of the ban j.^oncemed with the issue of safety. The 8' drop from gentle-sloped grused yM Applicants note, "It would be difScult excavited material will be used in Ihe fi ling ^ ,„eful storage to bring fill to this area and ^5'.'°"'*““"? '1,^ fining and grading.” This will minimize any the fall season. The upland area • .wetland wea was very ’ obvious, and there were moved further south. Purple Loosestn e i wetland Applicants' consultant confirms, signs of limited cattail growth wnthm reduce the Lility of Reed Canary Grass Exhibit D, Frame Restoration s mix of g 3 ^rga closest to wetland), and Purple Loosestrife to colonize this ^e non-point source LtffCmrering'nirhe we«:::d. li will also increase ihe biological diversity and value of this non-wetland area nsvis. Exhibi. p. E. ^ in the process of reviewing the proposal. Construction Plan auview Exlubiis H and U Note — ^fi':r:sifirr&"o“;S of wetland to be beneficial an a p p |g Loosestrife. He notes the Corps of Engineers has will help reduce the Reed Canao' ^vildlife ponds The plan is currently proposed with I .^1 a general permit #18 for the extava would never be approved under this permit. I e slope and at a maximum depth of 8 J^e P°"d wo^^^ show more recommends that the City not approv exceed 3 ^-4.5 '. He has included a section of graduated slopes^ specifically 8T,^an^^a^ p^ additional Stioi iftltmd under the guidelines of the permitting for wildlife ponds. Siafrasks iba. you review Seexion -56^ guidelines of the Corps olEnginee^^^^^ ,pp„eation and t";ldeletettabf,sbe for conducting the land alteration.