My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-12-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
02-12-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2023 3:52:18 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 3:47:36 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
513
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #2070 <br />September 15, 1995 <br />Page 3 <br />Standard <br />Lot area: <br />Parcel A <br />Proposed Required, <br />0.93 ac.2.0 ac. <br />Parcel B <br />Proposed Required <br />1.06 ac.3.0 ac (back lot) <br />. at street setback N/A N/A W ± <br />-at shoreline 297' 200 ’ 310 2M <br />- at 75’ setback 262’ 200 ’ 235 200 <br />*Note: As a newly created "back lot". Parcel B’s access corridor would have to be a 30 <br />outlot. and it’s defined street lot lire is the NW-SE line separating Parcels A & B. <br />Setbacks: <br />- North <br />- South <br />- East <br />- West <br />30 ’ <br />75’ <br />50 ’ <br />50 ’ <br />30 ’ <br />75’ <br />30 ’ <br />50 ’ <br />30 ’ <br />75’ <br />75’ <br />30 ’ <br />30 ’ <br />75’ <br />75’ <br />50 ’* <br />* These two setbacks can easily be met. <br />Hardcover allowance: <br />- 0-75’ 0- s f- <br />- 75-250’ 4,800 s.f.± <br />♦Excludes area of 12’x222’ driveway corridor, which could reduce this allowance significantly <br />if corridor is part of Parcel B instead of a separate outlot . . . <br />0 s.f. <br />4,750 s.f.±* <br />, 6,075 s.f. <br />- Note that in both cases this exceeds allowed hardcover. <br />Additionally, any structure placed on Parcel B will need an average lakeshore setback variance. <br />Municipal Sewer <br />As part of the Smbbs Bay project, this group of three propenies was assessed only one sewer <br />unit^ to serv-e the existing house. The City Council had earlier concluded that it was not <br />appropriate to provide sewer to the existing non-conforming cabins. <br />If the proposed lot line rearrangement/ replat was approved, a sewer connection charge of <br />$13 097.00 (1995 fee schedule) would have to be collected for the second unit.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.