Laserfiche WebLink
m <br />CITY OF ORONO <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />473-7357 <br />ZONING FILE #2070 <br />NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION <br />ACTION <br />DATE OF NOTICE: 9/29/95 <br />TO: Loren Brueggeman Co. LLC <br />2125 W. Hwy. 13 <br />Burnsville, MN 55337 <br />COPIES TO:Dean Maeser <br />372 Westlake St. <br />Long Lake, MN 55356 <br />TYPE OF APPLICATION: <br />DATE OF MEETING: 9/18/95 <br />Sketch Plan <br />VOTE:- FOR - AGAINST <br />planning Commission recommends the following: <br />No action required. <br />NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: <br />Planning Commission indicated the site plan proposed was well done, and showed how two <br />residences might be developed meeting most performance standards of the 2-acre lakeshore zone. <br />However, Planning Commission had difficulty with the lot acreage variances, and generally felt <br />that the historic use of the 3 tax parcels as a single property was a significant factor. <br />It is staffs expectation that this site and its propeny rights issues will be a topic of discussion <br />at an upcoming joint work session of the Planning Commission and Council. <br />Enclosed is a brief synopsis of the Casco Point simation in the early 1980s regarding a <br />substandard existing lot of record which was the subject of a lawsuit. Perhaps the most <br />sienificant differences between that simation and yours is that on Casco Point, no subdivision <br />was involved, i.e. it was simply an existing lot of record; and the lot could be developed without <br />the need for ^ variances except lot area and lot width. In your simation. none of the <br />individual existing lots of record is buildable without many variances in addition to the lot width <br />and area variances. <br />With a sketch plan, no formal action is taken by the Planning Commission. However, please <br />stay in contact with City staff as we will advise you on any discussions which may ensue at the <br />Council level.