02-12-1996 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF TF^ ORONO PLAI'JNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 18, 1995 (#18) #2070 L. E. BRUEGGEMAN COMP.ANIES» 372 STREET - SKETCH PLAN OF PROPOSED TWO LOT SUBDIVISION - PUBLIC HEARING The Certificiite of Mailing and .AfndaN-it of PubUcaiion were noted. Developer Loren Brueggeman and property owner. Dean .Maeser, were present. The property in question is located on Westlake Street. The sketch plan is a propLd lo't line rearrangement or replat to result in two builamg sites from a L99 acre ^oup of 3 ta.K parcels. This property is located in the single tamily lakeshore 2-acre zoning distria requiring 200’ width nammums. The home currentl) on P P ^ ^v^aps lots 10 and 11 with a storage-type building on lot 11. Two rental cabins overlap lots 11 and 12 but are mainly located in lot 12. The property curren y operates as on single property One sewer unit was assessed to the existing house but not granted to cabts. wlSch'axe non-conformmg and are in need of removal. Councd aoDlicant earlier this vear to connect the house to sewer and allowed the cabms to remam in use for two more years before they must be removed. The f system on the property, and the house must be connected to sewer immediateK . The cos of connecting to sewer is .SI 4,000 per unit. The appiicam decided to pursue a lot line rearTangement or of the buiJdino sites. The lots would meet the required setbacks with 50 front and 30 side bu would create a back-lot situation. The potential rights of the owner to have an addtuooal building site would be much greater if each eidsting lot was bmldaSle but they are not « many variances would be needed. If a back lot were created and roptool « meei the 150% requirement. Lot area variances would be required. T^e lot width as noted in case 1 is dependent on the 75’ line but would probably meet the lot ividth required. The lot coverage by smicrure aUowance is limited by hardcover maximums. An average lakeshore setback variance would also be required. In the question of a replai. would the City allow a narrow corridor to access the back lot would 30' be required as per the code'’ It is questionable whether two precis would be allowed in this 2-acre zoning. The lots use currently overlaps resuitmg m the ^ lots &Lonin» as one prooe-fry. If a subdivision is not possible. City questions whit reliet fould be ^ven to tte owner. Would it be possible to sell land to a neighbor? Developer Bnieugeman passed out sketch plans to the Commissioners showing wo 3 rim ^th a walkout rambler style home, square footage of which would be 4000+ s.f. both up^er and lower levels. Both would be on substandard lots but would be sellable according to Brueggeman. 30