Laserfiche WebLink
Request for Council Action continued <br />Page 2 <br />Februai9''l^, r996 <br />Zoning File # 2064 Irvin T. Geffre/Robert S. Olson, 4665/46XX Bayside Road <br />Oversized Accessoiy Structure Variance <br />Upon completion of the lot line rearrangement, Geffre's 2.56 acres would contain four accessory <br />buildings (detached garage, small shed, Quonset building, and the bam in question) totaling <br />4,182 s.f. His total acreage would only support 2,400 s.f. of accessory buildings per the zoning <br />code standards, and only one oversized accessory structure no more than 1,200 s.f. in area. <br />Mr. Geffre has agreed to remove the 1,014 s.f. Quonset hut located just north of the bam, <br />which reduces the degree of variance necessary, leaving him 768 s.f. o\er the accessory <br />stmeture footage limit for the size of his property. <br />Planning Commission at their September meeting concluded that because the bam is an e\i?ting <br />oversized structure in relatively good condition, a variance to the oversized accessory structure <br />ordinance was reasonable, subject to two conditions: <br />1. <br />2. <br />Removal of the Quonset building within 60 days of final subdivision approval <br />(The attached resolution sets a deadline of June 1, 1996). <br />The proposed new lot boundary must be moved further south to result in a <br />minimum 50’ setback from the south boundary for the shed (this has been done). <br />Easement Vacation <br />There is a drainage and utility easement 5’ either side of the old lot boundar>' which will no <br />longer be needed, and is not in use by any utilities or for any public purpose at this time. The <br />applicants have agreed to rededicate new drainage and utility easements along the new shared <br />lot line in exchange for vacating the old easements. All utility companies have been notified <br />and have given their OK for this easement vacation. <br />Future Development <br />Tlie proposal docs nisl include the conversion of Olson's Outlot C to buildable lot static. That <br />would have to be a tuture application and, depending on whether or not Outlot C was intended <br />to be further subdivided to create additional lots or just used as a single lot, would involve the <br />need for building of a driveway or road in Outlets B. C and D as well as the payment of park <br />fees. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />Planning Commission recommended on a vote of 6-0 to approve the subdivision and OAS <br />variance subject to the conditions previously noted, and approval of the casement vacation <br />subject to rededication.