My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-12-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
02-12-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2023 3:52:18 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 3:47:36 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
513
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
request for council action <br />DATE: February 2, l^A/b <br />ITEM NO.: ^ <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Jeanne A. Mabusth <br />Title Building & Zoning Administrator <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #2097 Patricia Guttormson, 3315 Crystal Bay Road - Variances - <br />Resolution <br />Zoning District: LR-IC <br />Total area = 14.530 s.f. <br />Adjusted area = 11,030 s.f. (-350 s.f of Crystal Bay Road) <br />Brief Review of Application <br />Applicant seeks approval of hardcover in 0-75' >t it''ick area, lakeshore setback, average lakeshore <br />setback and rear setback variances for structural/foundation improvements to an existing detached <br />garage and for the rebuilding of an attached deck at the lake and west side of the existing residence. <br />The applicant’s son-in-law had obtained a building permit for repairs to tlie detached garage and soon <br />realized the need to replace the block foundation and replace cement floor. The structural <br />improvements required variance approval as structure is located completely within the 0-75 setback <br />area. <br />The other part of the application involves a request to rebuild the attached deck which consists of <br />540 s.f to be reduced in area to 367.9 s.f. refer to Exhibit G. The deck will encroach no closer to <br />the shoreline nor will it extend closer to the rear setback line or extend any further beyond the <br />average lakeshore setback line than the existing deck. <br />The lot coverage excess exists at 16.1% and w ould be reduced to 14.6% as a result of the reduction <br />in the deck area. <br />Hardcover has been reduced 130 s.f within the 75-250' setback area and 172.1 s.f in the 0-75' <br />setback area. t\ ■'?*■*.* refer to the factual findings on pages 1 and 2 ol the enclosed staff memo dated <br />1/8/96. Ma;vt. •. Cl «n the 75-250' setback area will now conform at 22.2% (existing = 26.28°/o). <br />Tlie Planning Commission accepted the hardship statement of applicant also noting the dilficulty of <br />asking for additional paving removals in an area where off-site parking is a necessity.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.