My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-18-1997 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
02-18-1997 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2023 3:42:07 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 3:35:24 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
317
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
■'^1 <br />T-l <br />TO:Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator <br />FROM:Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager <br />DATE:November 14,1996 <br />SUBJECT: Septic Review for Application U2187, Donald & Robin Helgager - <br />Variances/Conditional Use Permit <br />The applicants propose the addition of a guest apartment to the existing three bedroom residence. <br />The purpose of this review is to determine if the existing septic system is of adequate capacity for <br />the proposed one bedroom addition and evaluate the potential for a future drainfield site when the <br />existing system fails. <br />The existing septic system is a filled trench system which was installed as an "alternative system" <br />in 1988 since no other "standard system" was viable on the property. Due to steep slopes a mound <br />system could not be used, but the seasonal water table was within 36" of the surface and the . andy <br />loam fill was used to gain a separation from the water table. The septic system appears to be <br />functioning properly at this time. The system is sized for a four bedroom residence, but no area is <br />available for future expansion if the system fails. All areas of sufficient size for the installation of <br />a future drainfield are filled or excavated and are unacceptable for constructing a "standard system". <br />The proposed expansion will not destroy any potential drainfield sites, however, expanding a <br />residence with no future septic system options but the use of holding tanks seems short sighted. On <br />one hand, the existing septic system should be adequate for the additional bedroom; on the other <br />hand, should the system fail holding tanks are liie only apparent option. No sewer mains are near <br />the property so municipal sewer could be a long time in coming. Orono's municipal code does not <br />require that a future site be available before such an addition be made, however. <br />In summary, although the addition is allowable per the septic code requirements, the City must <br />carefully consider the ramifications of allowing such an expansion when no alternate site is <br />available.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.