Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2187 <br />November 14,1996 <br />Page 5 <br />The proposed construction appears to have addressed each of these specific issues: <br />The apartment will be within the principal residence structure. <br />The intended use is for a relative of the applicants (who presumably will not be <br />paying rent). <br />The floor plans indicate a single common entryway serving the entire structure, with <br />additional accesses to decks and garage spaces. <br />Parking is pro\ ided by tw o stalls at the east end of the house to replace the existing <br />garage, and a third separated stall at the northwest end of the house to serve the <br />apartment use. <br />The existing septic system is conforming, and was installed in 1988 to serve a four <br />bedroom home. The proposed residence will include one bedroom in the apartment <br />and three bedrooms in the second level, for a total of four bedrooms. Like most other <br />homes being constructed in Orono, the total square footage includes areas that could <br />possibly be converted to bedrooms at some time in the future if the septic system was <br />expandable. A concern, however, is that there is apparently no alternate drainfield <br />site on the property (See additional discussion below). <br />The entire residence will continue to be known as 3265 Sixth Avenue North, and it <br />is intended that the utilities be metered as part of the principal residence. <br />Septic System & Well Concerns <br />The area proposed for the new addition could not be used as an alternate septic site due to its close <br />proximity to the existing well, and because this area has been cut/filled. Per Exhibit J, Steve <br />Weekman has concluded this propertj' has no apparent alternate drainfield site. While the existing <br />system should adequately ser\'e the proposed new construction, the City must consider whetherit is <br />appropriate to allow the proposed additions and expanded use of the property absent a future septic <br />site. An unknown factor is whether separate living quaners will result in redundant water use (2 <br />loads of dishes instead of 1,2 loads of laundry insted of 1, etc.) which could overlord the system... <br />The well is shown approximately 2' from the proposed foundation, and would either have to be <br />moved, or the house slightly redesigned, or a variance obtained from the Minnesota Health <br />Department, due to the requirement for a 3' setback from any portion of a building including <br />overhangs. This likely can be easily resolved.