My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-18-1997 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
02-18-1997 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2023 3:42:07 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 3:35:24 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
317
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3. <br />TO:Chair Lindquist and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />Michael P. GafTron, Projects Coordinator <br />Januar>' 15,1997 <br />SUBJECT: #2187 Donald and Robin Helgager, 3265 Sixth Avenue North - Variance <br />and Conditional Use Permit - Continuation of Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: RR-IB, Single Family Rural Residential, 2 acre, Shoreland (Natural Environment <br />Lake) <br />Application: Request for conditional use permit for guest apartment, and variances for lakeshore <br />setback, average lakeshore setback, and street setback. Applicants have revised the proposal <br />reviewed in November, and have increased the proposed street setback from 18' to 24' where a 50' <br />street setback is normally required. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Revised Site Plan/Landscape Plan <br />B - Revised First Floor Plan - Scheme A <br />C - Revised First Floor Plan - Scheme B (Proposed) <br />D - Revised Second Floor Plan - Scheme B <br />E - Old & New Site Plans (Sketch) <br />F - Notice of Planning Commission Action 11/25/96 <br />G - Planning Commission Minutes 11/18/96 <br />H - DNR Comments 11/19/96 <br />I - Memo and Exhibits of 11/14/96 <br />Discussion <br />At the November 18th meeting. Planning Commission voted 4-0 to table the application to allow the <br />applicants to revise the proposal per the following recommendations: <br />1.Reduce the street setback encroachment to stay in line with the existing front line of <br />the house. <br />But do not, in so doing, increase the proposed encroacliment of the required <br />lakeshore setback. <br />The easiest way to compare the previous and current proposals is to compare current Exhibit A \rith <br />Exhibit F of the > ovember 14th memo (See Exhibit E). Applicants have not changed the lines or <br />location of the rear (south) side of the proposed additions, but have reduced the total depth of the <br />west end addition by approximately 10'. However, the proposed Scheme B layout (Exhibit C)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.