My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-21-1997 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
01-21-1997 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2023 3:42:29 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 3:34:38 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
370
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
menutes of the orono planning commission <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 A <br />(#12 - #2190 James G. Fullerton - Continued) <br />Mabusth reported that the property for sketch plan review includes Lot 1, the original <br />Fullerton estate. Lot 2, the homestead of James Fullerton III, which will include a lot line <br />rearrangement. Lot 3, a developed lot once part of the estate, and Lot 4, which was <br />divided off but served by Fox Street on the east side. The current proposal is for a five lot <br />subdivision. It was noted that there will not be a back lot serving another properly. All of <br />the lots meets the area and width requirements. There is a caretaker house which will be <br />maintained. Application will be made for a condition use permit .and will meet the area <br />standards but is located about 45' from the lake shore. The accessory structure will be <br />removed as it is located on the lot lines and will not meet the standards. Mabusth stated <br />that the issue involves how to treat the upgrade of the road and whether a driveway access <br />would be allowed. <br />Winston informed the Commission tnat Tract E has an easement to use Fox Street but <br />does not currently use it. He also noted that the tract is not less than 2-1/2 acre lots as <br />required by restrictive covenants. Mabusth asked if the covenant restricts the number of <br />units. Winston said the limitation is only to the size. Mabusth said this would allow an <br />addit'onal unit to be served by Tract F for a total of possibly seven. <br />Mabusth informed the Commission that the entrance to the area is 25' width and <br />surrounded by retaining walls. She noted that it would be difficult to upgrade the <br />roadway. The City Engineer reviewed the access and determined that it should remain a <br />private road to a minimum width of 24'. Mabusth said it would be difficult for this to <br />occur within the 500' due to the wooded nature cf the property. The fire and police <br />departments will also review the plan. <br />Winston said it was his desire to retain the gate and amenities along the entry. Lindquist <br />agreed that it was a beautiful entrance. Mabusth said the plan calls for an innovative <br />approach to an upgrade, and if the Commission supports it, it would be difficult to <br />envision a 24’ width with a ditch. The Commissioners all agreed to support some <br />flexibility regarding this issue. <br />Winston reported that the division would result in lots of at least 4 acres in size. He noted <br />that the most northerly lot would be accessed directly from the street and several 'ots <br />would not utilize the entire length of the access. Only three lots w ould use the full extent <br />of the driveway to include the Fullerton homestead. Tract E and Lot 1 almost <br />immediately e.xist off of the private driveway. <br />Lindquist indicated that the private road would be maintained by the property owners.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.