Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 11,1995 <br />(#15 - #2092 Dennis Platteter - Continued) <br />Mabusth reported that the application was a proposal for a 2-lot subdivision of 5.64 <br />acres. The parcel originally consisted of 6.5 acres but area was lost due to the dedication <br />of Brown Road and Dickey Lake. The proposal is for a back/front lot configuration. <br />The back lot meets all of the standards. Mabusth said 150% of normal allowances is <br />required in the RR-IB. The property is also restricted by the 150' setback fi’om an <br />environmental lake. <br />Mabusth reported that the applicant is proposing to remove all of the accessory <br />structures including the pool. The existing residence does not meet the 75' setback from <br />the proposed lot line. Staff is not clear on the status of the residence. If the residence, <br />which is located 3-4 ’ from the side lot line, stays. Staff recommends asking for the lot line <br />to be altered to meet the side setback requirements. This was noted as a condition of the <br />Planning Commission's approval. If the applicant seeks a final plat. Staff recommends a <br />developer's agreement and letter of credit be obtained prior to the plat. <br />Mr. Platterer said he has not decided on what he will do with the existing house. The <br />potential buyer, may remodel the house. If the purchase is not made, Platterer said he <br />would remove the house. He noted his satisfaction with the resolution. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Callahan moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve Resolution #3659 per the Planning <br />Commission recommendation. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT <br />Callahan reported that Park Commission Chair Flint attended the DNR meeting regarding <br />the Luce Line trail paving proposal. Flint was unable to present the City's resolution due <br />to a format not conducive to its presentation. Discussion groups consisted of <br />governmental representation as well as those involved in the different activity groups that <br />use the trail Callahan said the majority were opposed to the paving of the trail from <br />Wayzata to Hutchinson. Flint had informed Callahan that there was a possible benefit to <br />paving the trail west of Hutchinson The DNR had presented a concept of a new form of <br />aggregate lime that would be in keeping with its present limestone bed. A revised <br />re^lution will be presented at the Council meeting of January 8, 1996. <br />ENGINEER REPORT <br />Cook had no additional comments. <br />1